The US Department of
Health and Human Services, HHS, released a press release last week stating that a new
element has been added to the Affordable Health Care Act or ObamaCare. (Click to
read HHS statement).
The new ruling states that all non-profit employers will be now be required
by law to provide and pay for insurance coverage to include all forms of
birth control, which includes contraceptives, morning-after pills, and
abortions.
Problem? Non-profit
employers include religious-based hospitals, charities and schools. One in six
hospitals in this country are Catholic-owned hospitals.
Biggest problem? The
Catholic Church does not believe in birth control of any kind.
Catholic institutions are
now being required by our government to provide and pay for measures that
fundamentally oppose their doctrine. They are now required to provide
something for their employees, which the Catholic Church teaches as an immoral
practice.
Contraceptives go against
their faith. Our government has asked the Catholic-run institutions to
compromise their morals.
Is this an overstep?
Absolutely.
WSJ Image / Getty Images |
The first amendment to our
Constitution states "Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof..."
A disregard for the
Constitution? I would argue that it is a blatant disregard
for that sacred document.
This has received little
media attention and yet it spotlights the worst suspicions that Conservatives
have had about President Obama. Suspicions that he is an individual who
wants greater government power even if it requires eradicating our liberties.
The White House is
beginning to feel some heat for this controversial measure.
They defend it by saying
that the new law does not compel anyone to actually take the
contraceptives--the employers must simply provide it. They also defend it
by stating that to sympathize with these religious institutions, they will
provide a one-year grace period to comply with the new law.
According to HHS,
nonprofit employers have until August 1, 2013 to comply. One year to
comply or face astronomical non-compliance fines.
Kathleen Sebelius, the
secretary of HHS, is now defending the added clause arguing it "strikes
the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and
increasing access to important preventative services."
Where in the Constitution
does it say "Congress shall pass no law respecting establishment of
religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof "unless one can strike
an appropriate balance?" It doesn't.
This is an overstep by our
government. This is an abuse of power at the highest level.
Peggy Noonan, a writer for
the Wall Street Journal wrote a fascinating column on Sunday about this latest
move by the White House. (Click to read WSJ column).
She criticized the President, but she also pointed out that there would
be backlash. People of faith are angry.
Rightfully so.
In her article she wrote,
"The (Catholic) church is fighting back. Priests in an estimated 70% of
parishes last Sunday came forward to read strongly worded protests from the
church's bishops. The ruling asks the church to abandon Catholic principles and
beliefs; it is an abridgment of the First Amendment; it is not acceptable. They
say they will not bow to it. They should never bow to it, not only because they
are Catholic and cannot be told to take actions that deny their faith, but
because they are citizens of the United States."
This was a huge mistake by
our President, but my fear is that this wasn't just a mistake. It simply
confirms his true intentions--a desire for a stronger, more powerful federal
government. It once again demonstrates a philosophy of government first /
people second. Furthermore, it shows a complete disregard for religious
institutions.
This is not going away.
It has stirred the religious right, religious independents and even
religious Democrats. It is not okay. It has stirred people of faith
and as Noonan wrote, President Obama has awakened a "sleeping giant."
I hope she is right.
No comments:
Post a Comment