For weeks we have heard about an enthusiasm gap
in the GOP presidential race. There is no question that among
conservatives, there continues to be a lack of enthusiasm for a "Mitt
Romney candidacy." Tuesday's contests were a perfect reflection of
that sentiment. Although the 3 state sweep for Rick Santorum was
noteworthy, it did offer an interesting analysis--the conservatives who showed
up to vote were not necessarily rallying around Rick Santorum, they were voting
against Mitt Romney.
They voted against Mitt because he "seems
stiff." They voted against Mitt because his "wealth makes him
out-of- touch." They voted against Mitt because they don't like his
personality. They voted against Mitt because they are skeptical of his
faith. They voted against Mitt because of his once liberal stance on abortion...(the same party that is
now quick to forgive Ronald Reagan for doing the same flip-flop).
The consensus seems to be that most voted against
Romney because they feel that he is "not conservative enough."
Truth be told, Mitt Romney is very conservative. Mitt Romney
is pro-life. Mitt Romney is pro-civil unions, but against gay
marriage. Mitt Romney is for limited government. Mitt Romney is for
free enterprise. Mitt Romney is for lowering taxes. Mitt Romney is
for a strong military. But perhaps most relevant for our troubled
economic times, Mitt Romney is fiscally conservative.
Can the same be said for Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich? Are they fiscally conservative enough?
Can the same be said for Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich? Are they fiscally conservative enough?
A CNN article today notes that Mitt Romney told a
group in Atlanta, "Under Newt Gingrich, earmarks doubled. Rick
Santorum was a major ear-marker and he continues to defend earmarks.
Under Rick Santorum, he voted to raise the debt ceiling 5 times to the
tune of an additional $3.5 trillion dollars." (Click to read CNN article).
Mitt Romney has raised a very interesting
question today that all conservatives must truly consider. How can we
possibly send a candidate to the White House to fix a fiscal problem that they
helped create?
***
In everything I have read, I have never once
heard anyone say that they voted against Romney because he has the "wrong
experience." No one can say that because he doesn't. His
experience makes him a fascinating candidate.
I would further argue, his experience makes him
the perfect candidate.
In our party's quest to find the candidate with
the "right conservative values"-- the best, most electable candidate
is now being overlooked. He is being overlooked for a candidate that can
never beat Obama. A candidate whose extreme social views can't even
energize conservatives, but will undoubtedly energize the left.
Do we really think that Rick Santorum or Newt
Gingrich will compete well against Obama? One of the most socially
popular presidents of our time? I think it is important to remember that
the last time Rick Santorum ran for re-election, he lost by 18-points to Bob
Casey (D). His conservative platform was not enough to re-elect him in his own
state by his own constituents. Will it be enough this time around to un-seat Obama? I cannot imagine.
If we are going to choose a nominee to address the fiscally tumultuous and toxic environment in DC and repair our fragile economy, then we need to choose someone who has the credentials to do it. Someone who has proven that they know how. Someone who won't be unprepared for the task at hand.
We finally have a candidate running for president
of the United States whose qualifications are remarkable. Shame on us if
we are willing to overlook him because we don't like the way he makes us feel.
Shame on us if we overlook someone because they come across a little
stiff. Shame on our party if we vote for another presidential candidate, like
Obama, who has never governed a day in his life. Shame on us if we vote
for another candidate who is telling us what we want to hear.
But, for now it appears our party is headed down
this path.
No wonder that the left is now salivating at the thought
of the November elections. This path is heading to an Obama 2nd term.
Alecia, as always your comments are spot on and make a great point. Republicans absolutely should be ashamed that they are allowing their own religious bigotry to cloud what is best for our country.
ReplyDelete